Home > Circular Error > Circular Error Probable Equation

# Circular Error Probable Equation

## Contents

Press (PDF Link) MS Excel 97-2003 Worksheet with pre-worked out equations based on this page available HERE. It allows the x- and y-coordinates to be correlated and have different variances. That is, if CEP is n meters, 50% of rounds land within n meters of the target, 43% between n and 2n, and 7% between 2n and 3n meters, and the We make no such distinction here. http://trinitylabsupply.com/circular-error/circular-error-probability-equation.html

Grubbs, F. and Halpin, A. Munitions may also have larger standard deviation of range errors than the standard deviation of azimuth (deflection) errors, resulting in an elliptical confidence region. Included in these methods are the plug-in approach of Blischke and Halpin (1966), the Bayesian approach of Spall and Maryak (1992), and the maximum likelihood approach of Winkler and Bickert (2012). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_error_probable

## Circular Error Probable Excel

The calculation of the correlated normal estimator is difficult and requires numerical approaches only available in specialized software. What is the SSPS? 0.5 (250/1000)^2 = 0.957603 or 95% Calculating the Lethal Radius of a Warhead versus a Target for a Groundburst LR = 2.62 * Y(1/3) / H(1/3) Where: But the lack in accuracy can be compensated by firing several missiles in succession. With large bias however, the RMSE estimator becomes seriously wrong.

Applying the natural logarithm to both sides and solving for n results in: n = ln(0.1) / ln(0.944) = 40 So forty missiles with a CEP of 150 m are required C. R. Circular Error Excel It works best for a mostly circular distribution of $$(x,y)$$-coordinates (aspect ratio of data ellipse $$\leq 3$$).

The Ethridge estimator stands out because it does not require bivariate normality of the $$(x,y)$$-coordinates. Circular Error Probable Gps The Rayleigh estimator uses the Rayleigh quantile function for radial error (Culpepper, 1978; Singh, 1992). Targeting smaller cities or even complexes was next to impossible with this accuracy, one could only aim for a general area in which it would land rather randomly. The general case allows that the point-of-aim is offset from the true center point-of-impact.

Munitions with this distribution behavior tend to cluster around the aim point, with most reasonably close, progressively fewer and fewer further away, and very few at long distance. Circular Error Pendulum It differs from them insofar as it is based on the recent Liu, Tang, and Zhang (2009) four-moment non-central $$\chi^{2}$$-approximation of the true cumulative distribution function of radial error. It is defined as the radius of a circle, centered on the mean, whose boundary is expected to include the landing points of 50% of the rounds.[2][3] That is, if a Principles of Naval Weapon Systems.

## Circular Error Probable Gps

CEP is not a good measure of accuracy when this distribution behavior is not met. http://ballistipedia.com/index.php?title=Circular_Error_Probable Conversion between CEP, RMS, 2DRMS, and R95 While 50% is a very common definition for CEP, the circle dimension can be defined for percentages. Circular Error Probable Excel The Grubbs-Patnaik estimator (Grubbs, 1964) differs from the Grubbs-Pearson estimator insofar as it is based on the Patnaik two-moment central $$\chi^{2}$$-approximation (Patnaik, 1949) of the true cumulative distribution function of radial Circular Error Probable Calculator Statistical measures of accuracy for riflemen and missile engineers.

H. (1966). "Asymptotic properties of some estimators of quantiles of circular error." Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 61 (315), pp. 618–632. http://trinitylabsupply.com/circular-error/circular-error-probable-bomb.html For more excerpts see The Probability of Becoming a Homicide Victim and How To Use the Expected Value. Your cache administrator is webmaster. p.63. ^ Circular Error Probable (CEP), Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center Technical Paper 6, Ver 2, July 1987, p. 1 ^ Payne, Craig, ed. (2006). Circular Error Probable Matlab

Y: 1.2(1/3) = 1.062659H: 10(1/3) = 2.154435 2.62 * (1.062659 / 2.154435) = 1.29 nautical miles Calculating the Single Shot Probability of Kill (SSPK) SSPK: 1 – 0.5 (LR/CEP)^2 Where: CEP: Without taking systematic bias into account, this estimate can be based on the closed-form solution for the Hoyt distribution of radial error (Hoyt, 1947; Paris, 2009). Several methods have been introduced to estimate CEP from shot data. this contact form To incorporate accuracy into the CEP concept in these conditions, CEP can be defined as the square root of the mean square error (MSE).

So we can turn the above formula for p(all miss) into an equation by inserting p(all miss) = 0.1 and leaving the number of missiles n undetermined: 0.1 = 0.944n All Spherical Error Probable Munitions with this distribution behavior tend to cluster around the aim point, with most reasonably close, progressively fewer and fewer further away, and very few at long distance. Search this blog: Search for: Recent Posts Skype Lessons - Math andPhysics Just a Thought New E-Book Release: Math Concepts Everyone Should Know (And CanLearn) A Formula For Risk ofNightmares Blog

## So there was a 50/50 chance of a V2 landing within 17 km of its target.

In the literature this is referred to as systematic accuracy bias. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Ann Arbor, ML: Edwards Brothers. [3] Spall, J. 2drms The Krempasky (2003) estimate is based on a nearly correct closed-form solution for the 50% quantile of the Hoyt distribution.

The resulting distribution reduces to the Rice distribution if the correlation is 0 and the variances are equal. What is the P(kill)n? 1-(1-0.45)5 = 0.7627 or 76.27% Computing the Equivalent Megatonnage (EMT) of a Weapons System EMT = N x Y2/3 Where: EMT: Equivalent Megatonnage against Soft TargetsN: Number It is based on the Pearson three-moment central $$\chi^{2}$$-approximation (Imhof, 1961; Pearson, 1959) of the cumulative distribution function of radial error in bivariate normal variables. navigate here The system returned: (22) Invalid argument The remote host or network may be down.

If systematic accuracy bias is taken into account, this estimator becomes the Rice estimator. In the military science of ballistics, circular error probable (CEP) (also circular error probability or circle of equal probability[1]) is a measure of a weapon system's precision. Assuming the impacts are normally distributed, one can derive a formula for the probability of striking a circular target of Radius R using a missile with a given CEP: p = URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6217081&isnumber=6215928 External links Circular Error Probable in the Ballistipedia Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circular_error_probable&oldid=748558282" Categories: Applied probabilityMilitary terminologyAerial bombsArtillery operationBallisticsWeapon guidanceTheory of probability distributionsStatistical distance Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged inTalkContributionsCreate

URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2282775 MacKenzie, Donald A. (1990). CEP is not a good measure of accuracy when this distribution behavior is not met. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2290205 Daniel Wollschläger (2014), "Analyzing shape, accuracy, and precison of shooting results with shotGroups". [4] Reference manual for shotGroups, an R package [5] Winkler, V.

The MSE will be the sum of the variance of the range error plus the variance of the azimuth error plus the covariance of the range error with the azimuth error Feel free to share:TweetLike this:Like Loading... Bedford, MA: The MITRE Corporation; United States Air Force. It is defined as the radius of a circle, centered on the mean, whose boundary is expected to include the landing points of 50% of the rounds.[2][3] That is, if a

Both the Grubbs-Pearson and Grubbs-Patnaik estimators are easy to calculate with standard software as long as the central $$\chi^{2}$$-distribution is available (as it is, for example, in spreadsheets). Thus the SSKP is: p = 1 – exp( -0.41 · 56² / 150² ) = 0.056 = 5.6 % So the chances of hitting the target are relatively low. As you can verify by doing the appropriate calculations, three DF-21 missiles would have achieved the same result.